Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7
the stunning, unending dishonesty of president obama about, yes, you can keep your policy with can we now know he said at least 39 times because we have it on videotape, at least 39 times. you can't have government of the people -- and lincoln's very clear with this. supposedly, in talking with some of the great lincoln experts, and i've written a novel on gettysburg, and calista and i spent time there. she actually got dressed up in an 1860s outfit, and i got dressed up. i was a congressman, she was the congressman's wife, and later she actually appeared in one of our other civil war novels as aous wife who says hostile things to the soldiers about having brought all these poor, dying guys into her home. but we've spent a lot of time looking at gettysburg and being at gettysburg. and you have to understand that lincoln apparently said government of the people, by the people, for the people. and to him, it meant the very heart of american exceptionalism. the we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. and that's why
, something that has made a stunning part of this, on president obama about yes, you can keep your policy. with which we now know he said at least 39 times, because we have it on videotape. and you cannot have government of the people. and supposedly in talking with some of the great lincoln experts, she actually got dressed up in an 1860s outfit and i got dressed up, she was a congresswoman's wife and she later appeal appeared as a housewife whose house had had become a hospital and she said some hostile things to the soldiers about having let all these guys into her home. but we spent a lot of time looking at gettysburg and being there. and you have to understand that lincoln apparently said that the government of the people by the people and for the people is a part of this and to him it meant the heart of exceptionalism. we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights, which are life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. and that is why if you cannot have an honest debate and conversation and you cannot have an executive officer who you could believe in, you begin to
something in place to stop that? and my comment is everybody is keep talking about president obama, they're blaming president obama for this and that, but the one thing that they have to remember, everybody has to remember that he can't do it alone. he can't do anything by himself. thank you, and i'll hear your comment. >> guest: well, certainly on your last point, that's right. i think that there has to be a bipartisan solution to our budget problems. one of the things that -- a positive aspect about the budget deal that seems to be developing, small though it is, is that it would be an instance in which the democrats and the republicans have agreed on on something and that the white house presumably is okay with. so it may be a short deal, but at least it would be something that had bipartisan support. on the food stamp question, you know, i think that food stamp costs, you know, went up with the economy. when the economy went down, you know, that raises food stamp expenditures because more people need the assistance. some of that is coming down, but there's really still certainly a ne
that you have to watch this and what you give the american government and its not a way to keep our constitution. >> we have ed from spring hill, florida. >> hello. >> did you write the book? >> yes, that's interesting. people sometimes say, why did barack obama change his position. and i think that it changed he didn't trust george w. bush and i think when he became president, he felt differently about it and he trusted himself to use it wisely. or the president, i might not want to. but we don't have a chance of changing this as president, i don't know that we will ever have a chance. one thing he does say i don't care what people regional library, i only want to go after terrorists and nobody can really prove the abuses of his power. and number two i think that history shows us that there will be of use. and we have some of this noted documents. in this includes this as well. so i would like to think that i could remember the it is important to the that the constitution and i understand the difficult position. >> the next call for susan herman. margaret from florida, hello, and g
. >> caller: hi. my thought last week and two weeks ago president obama kept repeating things like you can keep your doctor and the whole scenario of all that. he kept repeating over and over and over. and i had thought had i always thought of him as the president of the united states. but it occurred to me when he kept saying that. it was almost like someone hiptized it occurred it came to me thought. the whole group that got in to the white house may be using him as the mouthpiece for the whole group. anever would have got ton the white house as someone articulate as president obama. and he is. >> host: who is the whole group? >> caller: i'm talking about a group of progressives that wanted in to the white house and they wanted to be in it regardless of whether they can get elected or not. but president obama seemed like a good candidate to be their mouthpiece. it's kind of what he's acting like. because nobody ask get fired because they are in charge. and he isn't. >> host: okay. >> caller: it occurred to me
, their education, their experience said, "no." why? because they don't want president obama to have these people on this important court. they want to keep the court with a majority of republicans. that is wrong. it's wrong. and there were many reasons that we did what we did but it was the right thing for the country. it's the right thing for democracy. i ask unanimous consent that the senate proceed to executive session to consider nominations calendar number 30, 347, 348, 349, 450, 383, 382 accident 384, 386, 434, 435, 436, and 437, that the nominations be confirmed, the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid on the table, no further action, any statements related to the nominations be printed in the record, that president obama be immediately notified of the senate's action and the senate then resume legislative session. the presiding officer: is there objection? mr. alexander: madam president, reserving the right to object. the presiding officer: the senator from tennessee. mr. alexander: thank you, madam president. reserving the right to object. and again, i'll make my comments a
and how bad the fact did and say, are they going to change just like that? are they going to keep doing what they've been doing? once again, if they get a nuclear weapon, every country in the area will have a nuclear weapon. the question also comes, president obama spleen, the steel allows them to enrich uranium to a certain point. it only takes a few minutes to go from that point to nuclearization. if that's where you want to have them wear brand two months away from having a nuclear weapon at all times, if that makes everybody happy, that's pretty scary. >> host: back to the "washington post." they also write this. sunni arab states don't object to deal that could curb iran's nuclear objections, but they worry about the ramifications of ties between tehran and washington said one security expert, the big worry he said at a long-term deal normalizing ties between iran and the united states took him at the expense of sunni influence. what do you think about this? expanded a little bit. they like to make friends with our past foes and kind of ignore our allies. this kind of plays into it
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7